Accueil🇫🇷Chercher

Laurence BonJour

Laurence BonJour (né le ) est un philosophe américain, professeur émérite à l'Université de Washington.

Laurence BonJour
une illustration sous licence libre serait bienvenue
Biographie
Naissance
Nationalité
Formation
Activités

Bibliographie

Livres

  • The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985), pp. xiii, 258.
  • In Defense of Pure Reason. (London: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. xiv, 232.
  • Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses. (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002), pp. viii, 283.
  • Epistemic Justification: Internalism vs. Externalism, Foundations vs. Virtues (en collaboration avec Ernest Sosa). (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003), pp. vii, 240.
  • Philosophical Problems: An Annotated Anthology (Ă©ditĂ© en collaboration avec Ann Baker). (New York: Longman, 2005), pp. xvi, 876.

Articles

  • Sellars on Truth and Picturing, International Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 13 (1973), p. 243–65.
  • Rescher's Idealistic Pragmatism, The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 29 (1976), p. 702–26.
  • Determinism, Libertarianism, and Agent Causation, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, vol. 14 (1976), p. 145–56.
  • The Coherence Theory of Empirical Knowledge, Philosophical Studies, vol. 30 (1976), p. 281–312; reprinted in Paul Moser (ed.) Empirical Knowledge (Rowman & Littlefield, 1986), in Louis Pojman (ed.), The Theory of Knowledge (Belmont, California: Wadsworth, 1993), and in Michael Goodman and Robert A. Snyder (eds.) Contemporary Readings in Epistemology (Prentice-Hall, 1993).
  • Can Empirical Knowledge Have a Foundation? American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 15 (1978), p. 1–14; reprinted in Paul Moser (ed.), Empirical Knowledge (Totowa, N. J.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1986) and in Louis Pojman (ed.), The Theory of Knowledge (Belmont, California: Wadsworth, 1993).
  • Rescher's Philosophical System, in E. Sosa (ed.), The Philosophy of Nicholas Rescher (Dordrecht, the Netherlands: D. Reidel, 1979), p. 157–72.
  • Externalist Theories of Empirical Knowledge, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 5 (1980), p. 53–73.
  • Reply to Christlieb, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, vol. 24 (1986), p. 415–29.
  • A Reconsideration of the Problem of Induction, Philosophical Topics, vol. 14 (1986), p. 93–124.
  • Nozick, Externalism, and Skepticism, in S. Luper-Foy (ed.), The Possibility of Knowledge: Nozick and His Critics (Totowa, N. J.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1987), p. 297–313.
  • Reply to Steup, Philosophical Studies, vol.
  • Reply to Moser, Analysis, vol. 48 (1988), p. 164–65.
  • Replies and Clarifications, in J. W. Bender (ed.), The Current State of the Coherence Theory: Essays on the Epistemic Theories of Keith Lehrer et Laurence BonJour (Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer, 1989), p. 276–92.
  • Reply to Solomon, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
  • Is Thought a Symbolic Process? Synthese, vol. 89 (1991), p. 331–52.
  • A Rationalist Manifesto, Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume 18 (1992), p. 53–88.
  • Fumerton on Coherence Theories, Journal of Philosophical Research, vol. 19 (1994), p. 104–108.
  • Against Naturalized Epistemology, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 19 (1994), p. 283–300.
  • Sosa on Knowledge, Justification, and 'Aptness, Philosophical Studies, vol. 78 (1995), p. 207–220.
  • Toward a Moderate Rationalism", Philosophical Topics, vol. 23 (1995), p. 47–78.
  • Plantinga on Knowledge and Proper Function", in Jonathan Kvanvig (ed.), Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology ( Rowman & Littlefield, 1996), p. 47–71.
  • Haack on Justification and Experience, Synthese.
  • The Dialectic of Foundationalism and Coherentism, in the Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, ed. John Greco and Ernest Sosa, Blackwell.
  • Toward a Defense of Empirical Foundationalism, in Michael DePaul (ed.), Resurrecting Old-Fashioned Foundationalism (Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000). With a reply to criticisms by John Pollock and Alvin Plantinga.
  • Foundationalism and the External World, in James Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 13 (2000).
  • Critical study of Evan Fales, A Defense of the Given, Nous.
  • The Indispensability of Internalism, Philosophical Topics.
  • Internalism and Externalism, in the Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Paul Moser.
  • Analytic Philosophy and the Nature of Thought (Unpublished)
  • What is it Like to be a Human (Instead of a Bat)? (non publiĂ©)

Articles pour encyclopédie et dictionnaires

  • Externalism/Internalism et Problems of Induction", in E. Sosa & J. Dancy (eds.), A Companion To Epistemology (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).
  • A Priori/A Posteriori , Coherence Theory of Truth et Broad, Charlie Dunbar in The Cambridge Dictionary Of Philosophy, ed. Robert Audi, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  • Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge, in the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  • Epistemological Problems of Perception , in the on-line Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Comptes-rendus

  • Of Gilbert Harman, Thought, Philosophical Review, vol. 84 (1975), p. 256–58.
  • Of R. M. Dworkin (ed.), Philosophy of Law; and Kenneth Kipnis (ed.), Philosophical Issues in Law, Teaching Philosophy, vol. 2 (1977-78), p. 325–28.
  • Of James Cornman, Skepticism, Justification, and Explanation, Philosophical Review, vol. 91 (1982), p. 612–15.
  • Of D. J. O'Connor and Brian Carr, Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge, Teaching Philosophy, vol. 7 (1984), p. 64–66.
  • Of Paul Ziff, Epistemic Analysis, Canadian Philosophical Reviews
  • Of Lorraine Code, Epistemic Responsibility, Philosophical Review.
  • Of Alan Goldman, Empirical Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
  • Of Robert Fogelin, Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification, Times Literary Supplement.
  • Of Michael DePaul and William Ramsey (eds.), Rethinking Intuition, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
  • Of Paul Boghossian and Christopher Peacocke (eds.), New Essays on the A Priori, forthcoming in Mind.

Liens externes

Source de la traduction

Cet article est issu de wikipedia. Text licence: CC BY-SA 4.0, Des conditions supplémentaires peuvent s’appliquer aux fichiers multimédias.